Monday, December 15, 2014
Saturday, December 13, 2014
So, here’s another one of those posts that I had copied from somewhere, moved to a folder and then forgot about!
There’s been much written on “gratitude” in the past few years especially with Oprah having popularized the gratitude journal. It’s not that I’m an ungrateful person, BUT I think I reacted in a stereotypical, New York jaded kind of way. I deliberately avoided writing or speaking about gratitude in any of my blogs or talks. And, yes, I feel rather embarrassed writing that!
Recently, though, I’ve rediscovered the power of mindfully making the giving of thanks a part of my daily ritual.
I don’t recall where I found the following snippet, but in rediscovering it, it occurred to me that perhaps wedding stress could be reduced if, each day, you followed the exercise suggested in the article – except, make the “three things” all related to your wedding.
Hey, it’s worth a try and I think you’ll be surprised – for the good!
Try This Gratitude Exercise
For the next five days, do the following daily:
Think of three things that happened that day for which you’re grateful. Jot them down. As days pass, you may notice that you’re now on the lookout throughout the day for reasons to be grateful. You may easily come up with a dozen candidates that you’ll winnow to three for your list—and your attitude will perk up as you start to see the world in a more positive light, says Jacqueline Lewis, co-founder of the World Gratitude Map and blogger at GlobalResilience.net.
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
Although I blog with the Huffington Post, I've never written for Yahoo Style. . .until today. Well, actually, I didn't write this post, BUT, I'm quoted in it and I'm delighted to have had the opportunity to share another great wedding story. . .
December 8, 2014
When we heard last week that Scarlett Johansson and fiancé Romain Dauriac were already married in a secret wedding in Montana, we started asking around if anyone besides a celebrity would plan a secret wedding.
Is it just the idea that an intimate event should remain private, and away from prying paparazzi lenses? Or are there other non-prying reasons that a couple may want to say “I do” under the veil of secrecy?
For Cara and her then boyfriend Raymond, who is originally from Germany, a secret wedding was the solution to his work-visa issue. “Raymond’s company was going to transfer him out of the U.S. so they didn’t have to deal with his visa,” Cara tells Yahoo Style. “So instead of being apart we decided to marry in secret in 2009.”
Friday, December 5, 2014
“Mr. Fleiss said that he has a French aunt who settled upon a word that best describes JoJo (his wife): ‘chaleur.’
‘It means having the quality of warmth,’ he said.
‘Imagine a snowy evening in the mountains, you see a log cabin with
a fire roaring — a feeling of home, of warmth and heart.
For me, that’s what JoJo is.’”
Yet another quote I picked-up from somewhere and have no record of where. But I love the image the unknown Mr. Fleiss paints of his wife. Intimate and desperately romantic.
What about you, what word best describes your partner? How do you want us to imagine your partner? Do they know this is how you think of them?
Monday, December 1, 2014
I saw that I would love him,
and that loving him would mean
saying yes to the self I would become
by loving him,
and no to the other selves
I would never become by not loving him.
I don’t know who made this observation – but, I’m deeply moved by the truth expressed.
I think the truth of this quote speaks to why making a vow to another person is such a profound act.
In a real way, you’re vowing to become the person you could only become through the loving of this particular partner – and no other.
Now that’s deep! And courageous. And generous.
Friday, November 21, 2014
I’m always reading other blogs, along with magazines and papers, and so I’m constantly clipping and saving tidbits I find interesting and think I might use on one of my blogs or in one of my workshops. Oftentimes, though, when I return to the clipping, I can’t recall why I had saved the info or where it’s from!
And so it is with this item. . .recently, I was sorting through a bunch of posts I had saved regarding weddings. I have no idea where I got the following, but apparently it’s a review of a book written by Mark Ishee, titled, “Wedding Toasts and Traditions.” I checked on Amazon and the book is now out-of-print. However, I love the info provided in this review – stuff related to the history of marriage I never knew.
This brief history might put your own planning into some perspective!
The author points to three stages in the history of marriage: marriage by force, marriage by contract and marriage by mutual love.
Marriage by force is indicated in our earliest historical record. A man captured a woman, generally from another tribe. This testified to his strength in warfare. The earliest “best man” aided a friend in the capture of a bride.
According to Ishee, the honeymoon is a relic of the days of marriage by capture. Frequently the tribe from which a warrior stole a bride came looking for her and it was necessary for the warrior and his new wife to go into hiding to avoid being discovered.
The “honeymoon” evolved as symbolic of the period of time during which the bride and groom hid until the bride’s kin grew tired of looking for her!
It is clear why marriages by contract developed in time: the revenge exacted by one tribe on another for taking one of their women was costly. At some point, compensation began to be delivered for the stolen woman in an effort to avoid vengeance. Preventing tribal warfare and compensating furious family members led to a property exchange: livestock, land or another woman would be exchanged for the bride.
As Ishee points out: “The very word “wedding” betrays the great stage of wife purchase through which marriages passed. The ‘wed’ was the money, horses, or cattle which the groom gave as security and as a pledge to provide his purchase of the bride from her father. From this ‘wed’ we derive the idea of ‘wedding’ or ‘pledging’ the bride to the man who pays the required security for her.
As time went on, this ‘bride’s price’ took the form of elaborate presents given by the groom to the bride’s parents. Negotiated over long periods of time, sending and receiving constituted that the marriage contract was sealed.
In some cultures, land, livestock and other valuables were given to the groom in the form of a dowry. These goods were offered as compensation to the groom when he assumed the burden of supporting the woman.
Such practices of marriage by contract lasted in England until the middle of the 16th century. The modern practice of ‘giving the bride away’ has its roots in the belief that the bride was property given by the father to the groom. In fact, the phrase ‘to have and to hold’ comes from Old English property transactions.
Marriage by mutual love was rare until fairly recently. You did not marry for love; rather, you were expected to love the one you married.
Ishee states: “It was not until the 9th or 10th century that women gained the privilege of choosing or refusing their husbands according to their own judgment. Rare exceptions to this are recorded since primitive times, where women claimed the right to select their mates.”
The practice of elopement was an early aspect of marriage by mutual love. It allowed a woman to marry a man of her choosing, rather than one who met her parents’ specifications.
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
When we talked, I felt brilliant, fascinating;
she brought out the version of myself I like most.
she brought out the version of myself I like most.
Recently I learned that close friends of mine (not the couple in photo) are divorcing after twenty years of marriage. I was / am stunned. I had no idea. Not a clue.
This blog is about weddings and not divorces. About beginnings and not endings. Yet, it’s been hard for me to write as I keep thinking on my friends – and on their wedding day.
I officiated their ceremony and I recall sharing with them and the other guests a memory from my time living in the South Pacific. I lived on an island in the Truk Lagoon. The people spoke Trukese and my favorite Trukese word is “Achengacheng.”
“Achengacheng” literally means anything that can be easily broken and it is also the Trukese word for “love.” My wish, corny as it might have been, was that they would always be each other’s “achengacheng” and that they would always hold each other as precious.
I know they tried – in more ways than I could ever imagine.
But how do you keep the love from breaking? How do you honor the “achengacheng”? Yes, there are so many ways, yet, I do deeply, truly believe it all comes down to COMMUNICATION.
The quality of your life is in direct proportion to
the quality of the communication in your life.
One night I grabbed dinner at my favorite local bistro. The staff knows me and brings me “the usual” without my having to ask. I was lost in a book when I happened to glance up and look across the room. Two tables lined the opposite wall.
At one sat a young couple in their 20’s, laughing, animated. And at the other table sat an elderly couple in their 70’s, talking, smiling. I thought—now here’s a dual snapshot of marriage. Except for the wrinkles, little differentiated the older couple from the younger. Both were smiling, talking and laughing.
The German philosopher Nietzsche claimed that, in its essence, marriage is one long, grand conversation. A lifetime of hearty conversation is the surest sign of real love.
Here are what I call SANITY SAVER Questions to get you and your partner thinking:
• If marriage is a conversation, do you and your partner enjoy talking with each other?
• Are you comfortable just being together?
• Are there any topics that are understood to be off limits? Why?
I don’t care if it’s corny, but you ARE each other’s ACHENGACHENG!